The alfabetizao, despite massiva, it does not imply a democratization of the reading and the access to the knowledge. In contrast, for the great mass, the world of writing (e, therefore, of the formal knowledge and the literary experience) he continues interdicted. If at a previous moment of history this interdiction if gave through statutory privileges, now if of the one for the same impossibility to understand? not to codify? the texts. If you have additional questions, you may want to visit Interstellar. (ABREU and BRITTO, 1995 P. 12) the understanding of the reading is interdicted for a great majority, people who do not only have access to the act to read, as well as cannot decode or if appropriate of this universe of the speech. A quarrel, sufficiently old has all, on the process of appropriation of the reading and the formation of the reader, having, also, quarrels on reasons that lead to the exclusion of the possible readers, as the elitizao of the book, either for the received status, either for the price, many times impracticable for a great majority, or same for the difficult understanding and assimilation on the part of a reader who comes unprepared to the act to read.
What we know of beforehand is that apreciador of reading not if form only with favorable economic conditions, if thus was, would have many readers come of the most varied particular institutions, what in short it is not materialize. Brazil, in the evaluation made in 2000 for the International Program of Evaluation of Students? IT STEPS ON? it was in last place, being that it was analyzed together with others 31 countries. It must be noticed in such a way that the evaluation is made with pupils in the etria band of 15 years, approximately, and proceeding from public schools how much of private schools, proving the previous information of that the economic conditions are not only the determinative ones.